Jesus Never Existed Now

The central thesis of Humphreys' work is based on the "Christ Myth theory," which posits that Jesus was not a historical person but a mythological construct.

While Humphreys’ work has gained traction in certain circles, it stands in contrast to the majority of academic historians.

You can find more detailed critiques and the full scope of his arguments through the Jesus Never Existed website or his published book . Jesus Never Existed - Kenneth Humphreys Jesus Never Existed

: Humphreys emphasizes that there are no neutral, contemporary historical records from the 1st century that mention Jesus, his trial, or his execution.

: He suggests that the Jesus story is a "peeled onion" that reveals nothing at its core, composed of elements borrowed from other figures like Apollonius of Tyana or Titus Caesar . The central thesis of Humphreys' work is based

: The work highlights parallels between Gospel stories and older pagan myths. For example: Turning water into wine mirrors the god Dionysus . Healing miracles are compared to those of Asclepius . Calming the storm is seen as an echo of Poseidon .

: Scholars typically point to the Roman historian Tacitus and the Jewish historian Josephus as early external sources, though Humphreys and other mythicists like Richard Carrier often dismiss these as later forgeries or hearsay. Jesus Never Existed - Kenneth Humphreys : Humphreys

: Humphreys and other mythicists, such as R. G. Price in Deciphering the Gospels , argue that the Gospels are anonymous fictional allegories rather than eyewitness accounts. Historical Context & Scholarly Consensus